Stria vs ScopeGuard AI: one check or a whole record
Stria vs ScopeGuard AI at a glance
Stria — Scope, sign-off and billing as one record — every client request judged against a locked baseline, and a tamper-evident approval you can export.
ScopeGuard AI — A single-analysis scope check: one payment per request, with no account required.
The short version
ScopeGuard AI is the better buy if you need an answer once or twice a year. There is no subscription and no signup — you pay $9 and get the analysis. Stria is a subscription, which only makes sense if scope requests are a recurring part of your work rather than an occasional surprise.
| Stria | ScopeGuard AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $19/mo — you + 1 collaborator, unlimited clients | $9 one-time |
| Standing free tier | 3 clients, 6 deliverables a month, no card | — |
| Seats at the entry price | You + 1 collaborator | Not stated by the vendor |
| Taken from money you collect | Nothing — you collect on your own Stripe | Not published |
| Price checked | Published on our pricing page | 2026-08-14 |
ScopeGuard AI figures were read from their own pricing page on 2026-08-14 and are re-checked on a 120-day cycle. Prices move — confirm current terms before deciding. ScopeGuard AI pricing
Choose Stria if
Scope requests arrive most weeks and you want a standing record rather than a series of one-off receipts.
Choose ScopeGuard AI if
You want one answer, now, with no account and no recurring charge.
Can you use both?
Genuinely compatible: a per-analysis tool costs nothing when idle, so keeping it for one-off second opinions alongside a subscription is reasonable.
This is the most lopsided comparison in this series, and not in the direction you would expect
from a page on our own site. ScopeGuard AI costs nine dollars once and asks for no account. For a
lot of readers that is the correct purchase and this post will say so.
The short answer
ScopeGuard AI answers one question. You paste your original brief and your client's latest
ask, pay nine dollars, and get back a traffic-light verdict — scope creep, grey area, or in scope
— with a confidence score, a rationale, pricing guidance, and a reply you can send in a firm,
diplomatic or collaborative tone. No account, no subscription, no setup.
Stria keeps the answer. The verdict is one step in a record: the locked scope version it was
judged against, the priced change order it becomes, the revision round it counts against, and the
invoice at the end.
Those are not competing answers to one question. They are answers to two different questions, and
the useful thing this post can do is help you work out which one you are asking.
Where ScopeGuard AI is the better choice
Genuinely, and in more than one case.
- A single decision. If you have one uncomfortable request in front of you right now and no
interest in changing your workflow, nine dollars is unbeatable. A monthly subscription to settle
one argument is bad value and we are not going to argue the other way.
- No signup at all. Not a trial, not an email capture — you paste, you pay, you read. That is
the lowest friction in this entire category, and friction is the reason most people never try
any of these tools.
- The tone options are a real feature. Getting the same judgement rendered as firm,
diplomatic or collaborative wording is thoughtful. The hard part of scope creep is usually the
sentence you have to write to a client you like, and having three registers to choose from is
practical help.
- It is honest about what it is not. Its own page says it is not legal advice. That is the
correct disclaimer and plenty of products in this space are vaguer.
Where Stria is the better choice
1. It is a record, not an answer
A one-off check has nowhere to put its conclusion. Next month, when the client says the extra
work was always included, the nine-dollar verdict is gone — and even if you saved the output, it
is a screenshot of an opinion rather than a dated artefact tied to a specific version of an
agreement.
Stria's scope is locked and versioned. A signed change order supersedes it with a new version
rather than editing the old one, so the agreement and the record never diverge, and the question
"what did we actually agree, and when" has an answer that does not depend on your memory.
2. The free check is closer than the paid one
Stria's own no-account check costs nothing and returns a verdict with one verbatim citation
from the excerpt you pasted. If your reason for choosing ScopeGuard AI is "I want to try this
without committing", the honest comparison is nine dollars against zero — and being shown the
sentence the call rests on is the part that makes the answer checkable rather than merely
confident.
Confidence scores and citations do different jobs. A score tells you how sure the model is; a
citation tells you what it read. Only one of those can be argued with in front of a client.
3. Detection you do not have to remember to run
ScopeGuard AI is something you use when you already suspect a problem. That is its design, and
its limit: the requests that cost the most are the ones that did not look like requests, so you
never thought to check them.
Stria watches for them. It detects an out-of-scope request inside forwarded client email, with no
mailbox to connect, and watches a selected Slack channel without workspace-wide message access.
It determines scope on every client comment, not only the ones a client marked expensive. And
when a message cannot be judged it says which setup step is missing instead of going quiet.
Detection is also available on a free plan, bounded by a daily as well as a monthly allowance, so
the watching is not the part you have to buy in order to evaluate.
4. It reaches the money
Pricing guidance is advice. An invoice is cash. Stria carries the priced change order through to
an invoice you can send, records partial payments against it, writes off what will never arrive,
runs a dunning ladder on a Stripe invoice, and syncs invoices, payments and reconciliation with
either Xero or QuickBooks Online, one ledger at a time. You collect on your own Stripe and there
is no platform fee on top of your processor.
5. The maths, if it happens more than four times a year
Read from each vendor's own site on 14 August 2026:
| Stria | ScopeGuard AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $19/mo, 2 seats | $9 one-time per analysis |
| Account required | Yes | No |
| Standing free tier | Yes | None — payment unlocks the analysis |
| Cost of one check | Included | $9 |
| Cost of twenty checks | Included | $180 |
Note what this table does not say. Nine dollars once is not nine dollars a month, and a table
that quoted it as $108 a year would be the single most misleading thing we could publish here.
It is a per-use price, and for low use it wins outright.
Feature comparison
| Capability | Stria | ScopeGuard AI |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict on a pasted request | Yes | Yes |
| Confidence score | Not stated | Yes |
| Verbatim citation from the scope | Yes | Not stated |
| Client-ready reply in selectable tones | Wording provided | Yes — three tones |
| Works with no account | Yes, for the free check | Yes |
| Passive detection of requests you did not flag | Yes | No — you paste each one |
| Locked, versioned scope record | Yes | No |
| Revision-round enforcement | Yes | No |
| Priced change order that supersedes the scope | Yes | Guidance only |
| Invoicing and collections | Yes | No |
Where a row says "not stated", their page does not describe it either way, and we are not going to
claim an absence we cannot check.
Moving over
There is nothing to move. A one-off check stores nothing to migrate, which is part of its appeal
and the whole of its limitation.
What you would carry into Stria is your client book: import clients, projects and unpaid invoices
from a CSV export — HoneyBook, Bonsai, Dubsado or a spreadsheet. Columns are matched by name where
we recognise them, split first and last name columns are joined, and anything we cannot place is
listed for you to point at a field before a single row is written.
How to decide in ten minutes
One question, and it is a counting question rather than a feature one.
How many times last year did a client ask for something you were not sure was included?
If the answer is one or two, buy the nine-dollar check when it happens and keep your money. If the
answer is "most months", you do not have a decision problem, you have a record problem — and
paying per answer will cost more than a subscription while still leaving you with nothing to point
at when a client disagrees.
Where to start
Stria is open, and its free plan is the fairest thing to hold up against a tool whose best quality
is that it asks you for nothing either: three clients, six deliverables a month, no card, and no
expiry.
Start your 14-day trial, or spend nothing at all first — the
free scope check needs no account and saves nothing, and the
live demo shows what the client sees.
Useful alongside this comparison whichever tool you choose:
what scope creep actually looks like,
how to tell a client a request is out of scope, and
the change order template clients sign.
---
*ScopeGuard AI pricing, flow and feature descriptions were read from the vendor's own site at
scopeguard.tinyship.ai on 14 August 2026, rather than from
third-party comparisons. Vendors reprice and change terms — verify current pricing and features on
ScopeGuard AI's own site before deciding. Stria figures are from our published pricing. Content was
rephrased for compliance with licensing restrictions.*
Related reading
- What is scope creep for freelancers?
- How to tell a client it's out of scope
- Freelance change order template
- Effective hourly rate for freelancers
Start your 14-day trial · Try a free scope check · All articles